Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> [ I can already hear somebody insisting on a yaml type :-( ]
> Now that's a case where I think a couple of converter functions at most > should meet the need. Well, actually, now that you mention it: how much of a json type would be duplicative of the xml stuff? Would it be sufficient to provide json <-> xml converters and let the latter type do all the heavy lifting? (If so, this patch ought to be hstore_to_xml instead.) regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers