On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Sat, 2009-12-19 at 20:59 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >> I put them on the TODO list at >> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Hot_Standby_TODO, under the must-fix >> category. > > I notice you also re-arranged other items on there, specifically the > notion that starting from a shutdown checkpoint is somehow important. > It's definitely not any kind of bug. > > We've discussed this on-list and I've requested that you justify this. > So far, nothing you've said on that issue has been at all convincing for > me or others. The topic is already mentioned on the HS todo, since if > one person requests something we should track that, just in case others > eventually agree. But having said that, it clearly isn't a priority, so > rearranging the item like that was not appropriate, unless you were > thinking of doing it yourself, though that wasn't marked.
This doesn't match my recollection of the previous discussion on this topic. I am not sure that I'd call it a bug, but I'd definitely like to see it fixed, and I think I mentioned that previously, though I don't have the email in front ATM. I am also not aware that anyone other than yourself has opined that we should not worry about fixing it, although I might be wrong about that too. At any rate, "clearly not a priority" seems like an overstatement relative to my memory of that conversation. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers