On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Greg Stark <gsst...@mit.edu> writes: >> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> If there were more than a single member of the class, I might think >>> it was worth the trouble ... > >> A quick glace at the list shows relatively few that actually need to >> be barred from columns. I could easily see people wanting to use >> columns named LEFT and RIGHT or VERBOSE. I suppose they've been there >> for a long time already though. > > Hm. I do not believe it'd work for LEFT/RIGHT because of join condition > syntax, but it might for ANALYZE, FREEZE, and VERBOSE; which would > actually amount to a pretty significant percentage of our > totally-outside-any-spec reserved words. > > I'm still not really eager to introduce yet another category of > keywords, but perhaps it is worth doing. Comments?
I'm about to get on a plane, but just to make you hurl here's another half-assed approach. ...Robert
gross.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
