On Dec 23, 2009, at 3:52 PM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
Robert Haas <[email protected]> writes:I'm about to get on a plane, but just to make you hurl here's another half-assed approach.Uh ... I don't see what that fixes? If CONCURRENTLY can be a column name this is still ambiguous.
How? ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
