On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> There are several pg_migrator limitations that appeared late in the 8.4
>>> development cycle and were impossible to fix at that point.  I would
>>> like to fix them for Postgres 8.5:
>>>
>>>         o  a user-defined composite data type
>>>         o  a user-defined array data type
>>>         o  a user-defined enum data type
>>
>> FYI, these pg_migrator restrictions are now gone when migrating to PG
>> 8.5, even _from_ PG 8.3.
>
> Wow, cool.  That seems like a good step forward.

It appears that the pg_migrator README needs a bit of revision to make
it more clear which limitations apply to migration between which
versions.  In particular, the current wording suggests that NONE of
the limitations apply to 8.3 -> 8.5 migrations, which is not the case
- e.g. we haven't done anything about the need to rebuild certain
types of indices.

...Robert

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to