Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > Robert Haas wrote: > >> On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > >> >> Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> >>> There are several pg_migrator limitations that appeared late in the 8.4 > >> >>> development cycle and were impossible to fix at that point. ?I would > >> >>> like to fix them for Postgres 8.5: > >> >>> > >> >>> ? ? ? ? o ?a user-defined composite data type > >> >>> ? ? ? ? o ?a user-defined array data type > >> >>> ? ? ? ? o ?a user-defined enum data type > >> >> > >> >> FYI, these pg_migrator restrictions are now gone when migrating to PG > >> >> 8.5, even _from_ PG 8.3. > >> > > >> > Wow, cool. ?That seems like a good step forward. > >> > >> It appears that the pg_migrator README needs a bit of revision to make > >> it more clear which limitations apply to migration between which > >> versions. ?In particular, the current wording suggests that NONE of > >> the limitations apply to 8.3 -> 8.5 migrations, which is not the case > >> - e.g. we haven't done anything about the need to rebuild certain > >> types of indices. > > > > Very true. I have just made a new pg_migrator release with an updated > > README file. > > Ah, cool. So this seems to imply that a migration from 8.4 to 8.5 > should be clear sailing. Is that correct?
Yes, so far. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
