On Monday 28 December 2009 22:39:06 Dimitri Fontaine wrote: > Hi, > > Le 28 déc. 2009 à 21:33, Kevin Grittner a écrit : > > We often see posts from people who have more active connections than > > is efficient. > > How would your proposal better solve the problem than using pgbouncer? > > <mad proposal time> > I'd be in favor of considering how to get pgbouncer into -core, and now > that we have Hot Standby maybe implement a mode in which as soon as a > "real" XID is needed, or maybe upon receiving start transaction read write > command, the connection is handled transparently to the master. </> Thats not as easy as it sounds - the master may not have all data needed by the snapshot on the slave anymore.
Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
