Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > It seems like it might be helpful, before tackling what you're talking > about here, to have some better tools for controlling resource > utilization. Right now, the tools we have a pretty crude. You can't > even nice/ionice a certain backend without risking priority inversion, > and there's no sensible way to limit the amount of amount of working > memory per-query, only per query-node. > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-10/msg00125.php I will review and consider. Thanks. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
