On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 11:17 +0900, Takahiro Itagaki wrote: > Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > > I have enough items emerging from HS to keep me busy much longer than I > > thought. I'll run with VF if that's OK, since I have some other related > > changes in that area and it makes sense to understand that code also, if > > OK with you. > > Sure. Many users want to see HS. > > BTW, New VACUUM FULL patch is waiting for being applied. > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=202 > But I heard HS is attempting to modify VFI in another way or remove it > completely. Do we still need the patch, or reject it and fix VFI in HS?
HS has two options: (1) move forwards alongside this patch, or (2) make a separate fix for VFI in HS. We still want to apply this patch, but I feel it needs changes as discussed downthread as part of my review. Will it be possible for you to make those changes and resubmit for next commitfest, or earlier? -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
