Robert Haas wrote: > I'm not exactly sure what Kevin's goal is here. I think it would be insane to try to do something like serializable isolation mode without having regression tests. I would want more tests than could reasonably go into the 'make check' suite to support development, but it would be very good to have some go in there. > For basic regression tests, yeah, we'd probably like to keep that > Perl-free. OK. Is parallel psql the only reasonable option? > For more complex testing, I think using Perl makes sense. Or to put > the shoe on the other foot, if we DON'T allow the use of Perl for > more complex testing, then we're probably not going to have any > more complex tests. Do you envision some test suite committed to CVS beyond the 'make check' tests, for "on demand" testing at a more rigorous level? Am I missing something that's already there? -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
