On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > However, wouldn't it make more logical sense to replace "host/hostssl" > with "replication/replicationssl" rather than overload the database > field?
Seems good. How about the following formats? replication user CIDR-address auth-method [auth-options] replicationssl user CIDR-address auth-method [auth-options] replication user IP-address IP-mask auth-method [auth-options] replicationssl user IP-address IP-mask auth-method [auth-options] Note that "database" field has been removed since it's useless for replication. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
