Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: >> However, wouldn't it make more logical sense to replace "host/hostssl" >> with "replication/replicationssl" rather than overload the database >> field?
> Seems good. How about the following formats? > replication user CIDR-address auth-method [auth-options] > replicationssl user CIDR-address auth-method [auth-options] > replication user IP-address IP-mask auth-method [auth-options] > replicationssl user IP-address IP-mask auth-method [auth-options] > Note that "database" field has been removed since it's useless > for replication. I'm getting more and more confused here. I thought we were talking about client-side .pgpass. This seems to be talking about pg_hba.conf. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers