On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 15:01 -0600, Kevin Grittner wrote: > As I understand it, Greg's line of thinking is that we should use a > technique which has never proven practical on a large scale: > matching database changes against a list of predicate lock > expressions. It's not that I want to do it any particular way, it's > that I want to get it working in the simplest possible way and then > find things which can be shown to improve overall performance of > meaningful work loads until we have something which has acceptable > performance. I don't reject "pure" predicate tracking, per se -- I > just won't put any time into it, since I don't expect it to work. I > would be overjoyed if Greg or anybody else could prove that wrong > with an optimization patch, say six to twelve months from now when > we hit that phase.
I think we are in agreement. I was responding to Robert Haas's comment, because it sounded like he didn't understand Greg Stark's point. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers