Hi, Kevin Grittner wrote: > As I understand it, Greg's line of thinking is that we should use a > technique which has never proven practical on a large scale: > matching database changes against a list of predicate lock > expressions.
I find that approach to predicate locking pretty interesting. However, unlike others, it scales with the number of concurrently held locks. And with the current trend towards multi-multi-core platforms, that might get worse and worse (as concurrency must increase to efficiently use these cores). Regards Markus Wanner -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
