(Many thanks to Dimitri for bringing this thread to my attention.) At 2010-01-11 10:46:10 +0100, mag...@hagander.net wrote: > > As for AOX, my understanding is that it is no longer maintained, so > I'd be worried about choosing such a solution for a complex problem.
I'll keep this short: Oryx, the company behind Archiveopteryx (aox), is no longer around, but the software is still maintained. The developers (myself included) are still interested in keeping it alive. It's been a while since the last release, but it'll be ready soon. If you're having any sort of problems with it, write to me, and I'll help you. (That said, we're not working on the web interface. It did work, in its limited fashion, but it's not feature complete; and I need to find some paying work, so it's not a priority. That, and some health problems, are also why I haven't been active on the pg lists for a while.) Feel free to write to me off-list for more. -- ams -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
