Robert Treat wrote: > > Now the other approach we could take is that we'll ship *something* > > on 7 Mar, even if it's less stable than what we've traditionally > > considered to be beta quality. I don't think that really helps > > much though; it just means we need more time in beta. > > > > There are three reasons I'd probably be comfortable with that; 1) the CF > process means we've likely had more eyes on the code going in than in past > releases.
The reality check is that was had commit-fests for 8.4 development and 8.4.0 had more easily-identified bugs than most of our previous .0 releases which didn't use commit-fests. -- Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
