On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Greg Smith <g...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I don't think anybody can deploy this feature without at least some very > basic monitoring here. I like the basic proposal you made back in September > for adding a pg_standbys_xlog_location to replace what you have to get from > ps right now: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-09/msg00889.php > > That's basic, but enough that people could get by for a V1.
Yeah, I have no objection to add such simple capability which monitors the lag into the first release. But I guess that, in addition to that, Simon wanted the capability to collect the statistical information about replication activity (e.g., a transfer time, a write time, replay time). So I'd like to postpone it. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
