On Jan 21, 2010, at 9:19 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > As far as I can see, there is absolutely zero reason to care about > whether the product is called Postgres or PostgreSQL.
How about simply "Post"? Or just "SQL"? ;-P > If it were > called WeGrindUpTheBonesOfSmallChildrenSQL, maybe a change would be > worth considering. And where do you think baby powder comes from? Sheesh. > As it is, I submit that the product name is not on > in the top 10,000 things we should be worried about fixing, even if > there were a consensus that it were a good idea (which there isn't) > and even if -core had not already made a decision on this point (which > they have). What I think we SHOULD be worrying about right now is > getting 9.0 out the door, and I am 100% opposed to letting ourselves > getting sucked into this or any other discussion which is likely to > make that take longer than it likely already will. +1 David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers