On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Kevin Grittner <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote: >> What I'd really like is to stop arguing about the number of >> CommitFests per cycle and the exact charter of each CommitFest and >> start talking about how we can create an environment where patch >> authors can get their work committed reasonably quickly (assuming >> it's good, of course) and released within some reasonable time >> frame after that > > Dimitri's reply with the "Too bad we can't have" portion makes me > wonder whether we really can't. Does it really take the concerted > efforts of the whole community five months to take things from the > deadline for patch commits (end of last CF) to release?
No. > Is it that > nobody would volunteer to take the burden of that effort so that > others could code? No. > Perhaps it isn't that five months is outrageous, > but that it doesn't really benefit from an unorganized swarm of > activity by all the developers, and we've not worked out a > reasonable framework for who should do what during that time to best > benefit the project while giving all these volunteer and sponsored > developers something they are willing to put effort into. I think that's pretty close. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
