Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> I think we need to either (1) fix the bugs and update the
>> documentation to remove the statement that this will be removed or (2)
>> actually remove it.

> I agree it's a mess but I don't think just abandoning the functionality 
> is a good idea.

Yeah, we can't really remove it until we have a plausible substitute for
the xpath_table functionality.  This is in the TODO list ...

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to