On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 14:52 +0000, Greg Stark wrote: > You said "I think we should extend the time available to make sure we > have a sensible set of features for 9.0." Perhaps part of the problem > is that I couldn't understand what your patch did from the description > you posted and can't evaluate whether it's fixing a problem that makes > the current feature set incoherent. Can you explain what it does in > more detail so we can understand why it's necessary for a sensible set > of features?
I'll break down the patch into two pieces to make it easier to review, and add more description, as you suggest. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
