On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 11:33 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > I even *fixed* that already, but you decided to take it out before > committing. I then added it to the list of must-fix items in the TODO > list, but you took that out too. I have no objection to doing things > in smaller steps, but this *is* a must-fix item before release. I > still don't understand why you took it out, nor why you're objecting > to that.
This is a misrepresentation of what has happened. The item you mention was added to the TODO by me in response to your comments and has never been removed at any point; it is still there now. You added a duplicate and the duplicate was removed. I removed code that you mentioned was buggy because I don't have time to fix it and it is not high enough up the priority list. We have discussed all of these things before yet you raise them again as if those things have never been said. I am working on TODO in a priority order. The priority list has changed over time in response to comments received from both you and other people. I understand you don't like my current sequence of actions and I'm sorry for that. I am trying to be rational and balance what has been said to me for the benefit of the community from all stakeholders and have consulted widely to gather thoughts. I am more than happy for other people to work on items on the list, as Joachim and Andres have done. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers