David E. Wheeler wrote: > On Feb 20, 2010, at 9:49 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > > >> This discussion is sounding very design-ish, which makes me think we > >> should just leave things unchanged for 9.0 and have external regression > >> test designers work around this problem in their Makefiles, as Alvaro > >> suggested. > > > > I would have said that some time ago, except that I think we have a > > "must fix" issue here: isn't pg_upgrade broken for any database > > containing plpgsql? A decent solution for that probably will allow > > something to fall out for the regression test problem too. > > There is also the "must fix" issue with pg_regress.
Why? My pg_regress runs just fine. If you are talking about 3rd party modules, I suggested conditional Makefile rules. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com PG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
