Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
>> Well, I was asking why you labeled it "must fix" rather than "should
>> fix". I am fine with the pg_regress.c change.
> Yeah, if it makes life easier for other people, I say we go for it.
I don't think that the way to fix this is to have an ugly kluge in
pg_dump and another ugly kluge in pg_regress (and no doubt ugly kluges
elsewhere by the time all the dust settles).
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
