Dimitri Fontaine <dfonta...@hi-media.com> writes:
> Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> writes:
>> Why not just use pgAgent? It's far more flexible than the design
>> you've suggested, and already exists.
> What would it take to have it included in core,
I don't think this really makes sense. There's basically no argument
for having it in core other than "I'm too lazy to install a separate
package". Unlike the case for autovacuum, there isn't anything an
in-core implementation could do that an external one doesn't do as well
or better. So I'm not eager to take on additional maintenance burden
for such a thing.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
