josh, nobody is talking about it because it doesn't make sense. you could only retry if it was the first query in the transaction and only if you could prove there were no side-effects outside the database and then you would have no reason to think the retry would be any more likely to work.
greg On 1 Mar 2010 22:32, "Josh Berkus" <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: On 2/28/10 7:12 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >> However, I'd still like to hear from someone with the requ... "dead end" as in "too hard to implement"? Or for some other reason? It's undeniable that auto-retry would be better from a user's perspective than a user-visible cancel. So if it's *reasonable* to implement, I think we should be working on it. I'm also very puzzled as to why nobody else wants to even discuss it; it's like some wierd blackout. --Josh Berkus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subs...
