On Mar 8, 2010, at 8:03 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

> #3 is still an absolute nonstarter, especially for a patch that we'd
> wish to backpatch.

You're at least going to want to exclude Safe 2.20 - 2.23, IIUC.

Best,

David


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to