"Kevin Flanagan" <kevi...@linkprior.com> writes:
>>> Hard to tell without seeing the actual code and a stack trace, but I'd
>>> bet that you haven't fully resolved the build process problems you
>>> mentioned earlier.
> I've attached a zip of the (tiny) project, and a text file with the contents
> of the module containing the C-language functions. The only difference from
> sample code is that (as pointed out by Takahiro Itagaki in his post here of
> 8th March) the function implementations need decorating with
> __declspec(dllexport).
Mph. I don't actually believe that, nor do I believe the #define
BUILDING_DLL you put in, because neither of those are needed in any of
our contrib modules. What I suspect at this point is that the reference
to CurrentMemoryContext in the palloc() macro is being bollixed by
having the wrong value for BUILDING_DLL. However, not having a Windows
build environment to experiment with, I'll have to defer to somebody
with more experience in that.
(I wonder BTW if we should rename BUILDING_DLL, because it seems a bit
misnamed. AIUI it's supposed to be set while building the core backend,
not while building loadable modules.)
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
