2010/3/21 Craig Ringer <cr...@postnewspapers.com.au>: > On 21/03/2010 10:33 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: >> >> 2010/3/21 Craig Ringer<cr...@postnewspapers.com.au>: >>> >>> On 21/03/2010 8:03 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello >>>> >>>> Current form of function detail isn't too practical (see screenshot 1) >>>> >>>> we can move source code to separate area (maybe we can add rownumbers) >>>> >>>> see screenshot 2 (it is only mockup, real implementation can be more >>>> inteligent in rows numbering) >>> >>> Ideally, the output of the source listing could be used as input to >>> CREATE >>> OR REPLACE FUNCTION without excessive massaging. Those line number >>> prefixes >>> make it hard to grab the output of \df+ and do something useful with it. >> >> there is \ef statement now > > ... which I completely missed. My apologies; that problem is already solved.
:) Pavel > > -- > Craig Ringer > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
