>> In hindsight I could have loaded the ASCII release notes into a wiki and >> people could have modified, them, and later I could have converted them >> to SGML,
That was, in fact, *exactly* what you said you'd do 3 months ago when we discussed this. > > Yeah, I don't think that would have been better. Thing is, doing things like rearranging items for clarity is prohibitively painful in SGML. And while I know a professional copy-editor who would be willing to fix grammar, etc, she's not going anywhere near SGML. I think we're back at having two sets of feature information: one for the general public, one for the technically inclined. Or, to put it another way: I do the feature list for the general public. I'm not doing it in SGML. It's too freaking hard to edit. If someone else wants to take up doing that work, they can do it in any format they want. -- -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://www.pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers