On 3/22/10 7:46 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I do not require them to submit SGML; just some format where I can
> identify the lines that changed. I can do the same for the release
> notes. I have to check the diffs anyway so manually merging in the
> changes isn't a problem.
So there are 2 large problems I have with the SGML version, let's see if
we can deal with them separately:
(1) re-arranging and regrouping the items: the stuff in the release
notes should end up in 7-8 clear categories, with items arranged in
descending order by importance. SGML+CVS makes this a task which cannot
be done collaboratively.
(2) Seeing my edits. There's no edit-->view-->edit cycle with the SGML,
and it's really hard to check grammar and languge ... let alone compare
stuff to the alphas ... in raw SGML.
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
