Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> writes:
> Continuing the performance test:
> DBD, like a number of monitoring systems, does "pings" on the database
> which look like this:
> SELECT 'DBD::Pg ping test';
> In our test, which does 5801 of these pings during the test, they take
> an average of 15x longer to execute on 9.0 as 8.4 ( 0.77ms vs. 0.05ms ).
There's something wrong with your test setup. Or, if you'd like me to
think that there isn't, provide a self-contained test case. I ran a
small program that does
for (i = 0; i < 10000; i++)
{
res = PQexec(conn, "SELECT 'DBD::Pg ping test'");
PQclear(res);
}
and I only see a few percent difference between HEAD and 8.4.3,
on two different machines. (It does appear that HEAD is a bit slower
for this, which might or might not be something to worry about.)
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
