2010/4/6 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
> "David E. Wheeler" <da...@kineticode.com> writes:
>> On Apr 6, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Huh. I'm still curious, because in my test the overhead of those
>>> options seemed to be about 3x. So there's still something considerably
>>> different between what you did and what I did.
>
>> Are you doing this on a Mac?
>
> I hadn't, but since you mention it: 100000 iterations take about 7.5sec
> with non-assert CVS HEAD and 15sec with asserts, on a 2008 Macbook Pro.
> Color me still confused.
it is little bit offtopic. Can we add info about assertation to
version() output?
like
postgres=# select version();
version
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
───────────────────────────────
PostgreSQL 9.0alpha4 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC) 4.4.3 2010
0127 (Red Hat 4.4.3-4), 32-bit >>> with enabled assertation <<<<
(1 row)
Regards
Pavel Stehule
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
