On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Dimitri Fontaine <dfonta...@hi-media.com> wrote: > I guess a GSoC of reasonable size would be to define a spec for how to > implement partitioning in PostgreSQL with a sound and accepted proposal > on independent steps to contribute separately, in order to reach the > full implementation in an incremental fashion and by different hackers. > > Then you could pick up one of those items. By then I mean after the > summary and the plan both have been accepted by core people and by > contributors who said in the past they wanted to spend precious hours on > the topic. > > But I don't know if a GSoC can be completed without even coding.
According to the link below, GSoC proposals for documentation aren't accepted. This probably extends to other non-coding work as well. http://socghop.appspot.com/document/show/gsoc_program/google/gsoc2010/faqs#doc_proposals -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
