On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:16 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am sure so > dynamical materialised views is bad task for GSoC - it is too large, > too complex. Manually refreshed views is adequate to two months work > and it has sense.
That is my feeling also - though I fear that even the simplest possible implementation of this feature may be a stretch. Anyway we agree: keep it simple. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
