On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: >> > There was talk of including pg_migrator in Postgres 9.0 in /contrib. ?Do >> > we still want to do that? >> >> I think you articulated some pretty good reasons previously for >> keeping it separate and, at any rate, I'm not eager to do it at the >> 11th hour without due consideration and adequate engineering time. So >> I vote for holding off for this release and possibly revisiting at >> some point down the road. > > You might also remember I was outvoted. It will not be hard to put it > in /contrib as that is already a valid build option for pg_migrator.
[shrug...] If that's the consensus I'll go along with it, but I'm not excited about adding more things to our to-do list at this point, even apparently simple ones. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
