Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: > My personal feeling is that pg_migrator should be fully integrated, but > it's too late for that, obviously. Let's do it for 9.1.
+1 > I also think that the standards for contrib should not be so lax that a > completely new module can be added after beta. (This is mostly informed > by the feeling that contrib should go away entirely.) +1 For the record, the contrib replacement would look like proper Extension handling in dump&restore, PGXS support for windows, and PGAN for source level archive distribution. We'd still rely on distributions support for binaries. Those are the technical layers we need, then we'd have a PGAN entry for replacing contrib, and a host of other ones. The contrib Archive Network would contain -core reviewed (and maintained?) extensions, the other ones are on their own. Maybe the main other one would be (could be?) a new component of pgfoundry. Regards, -- dim -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
