"Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> writes: > Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> none of the other half are printing messages that are more useful >> than "out of shared memory" (which isn't even necessarily >> correct). > I think the messages in the locking area are a bit more useful than > "out of shared memory", but it would be trivial to build the > equivalent message in the ShmemInitHash function, based on the first > parameter.
Right, I was intending to include the "name" parameter in the messages. This would actually represent an improvement in message quality in a lot of the cases. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers