On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> I don't believe you are fairly stating the consensus from previous >> discussion and I believe that you are actually in the minority on this >> one. I agree that we probably don't need to support this for object >> types for which CREATE OR REPLACE is available or can be made >> available, but that isn't feasible for all object types - tables and >> columns being the obvious examples. > > What's obvious about it? In particular, I should think that ADD OR > REPLACE COLUMN would usefully be defined as "ADD if no such column, > else ALTER COLUMN as necessary to match this spec". Dropping the > ALTER part of that has no benefit except to lazy implementors; it > certainly is not more useful to users if they can't be sure of the > column properties after issuing the command.
Actually, that's a good idea. But how will you handle tables? ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
