On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 18:40 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > It's error-prone to control what happens in the standby from the master. > That's the "action at a distance" effect I mentioned earlier. The master > should be configured in the master, and each standby should configured > in the standby.
Repeating the same thing when its been refuted doesn't help. What you say has not been proposed. If there is a case for HS-off-by-default, make it. If you want to change code, arguing directly against your own position, mentioned many times, we need a reason. How else can we know which argument of yours to believe? -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
