Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > It is easy to think that this is a parameter that needs to be > turned on in the master to allow standby slaves to connect to it. > I think a different name would help. Yeah, I had to double-check because the current name wasn't, in itself, unambiguous. We'd be sure to get many posts from confused users on this if we don't rename it. > The best idea I can come up with on the spur of the moment is > "allow_standby_queries", but I'm not sure that can't be improved > on. That seems clear and self-explanatory to me. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
