On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> I think a different name would help. The best idea I can come up with >> on the spur of the moment is "allow_standby_queries", but I'm not sure >> that can't be improved on. Comments? > > One objection to that name is that it also works during archive > recovery, like during PITR, which is not a standby server. But that's > probably a rare use case.
Gee, I think of it as a standby regardless of whether it's created using archiving or SR. Do we not have a generic term that covers both cases? > +1 on changing it to something. Boy, my blog post is going to have a darn short shelf life (see the last paragraph). http://rhaas.blogspot.com/2010/04/write-ahead-logging-in-postgresql-90.html ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
