Kevin Grittner wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> Yeah, min_wal_segments or something would make sense. > > Surely it would confuse people to see they have fewer than > min_wal_segments WAL segments.
Umm, they wouldn't see that, that's the point of the setting. The segments are not removed/recycled until there is min_wal_segments segments in pg_xlog. Except in the beginning when you set or increase the setting, when there isn't that many segments generated yet. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
