Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 12:22 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >>>> (wal_keep_segments can be changed without restarting, right?) > >>> Should we allow -1 to mean "keep all segments"? > >> Why is that not called "max_wal_segments"? wal_keep_segments sounds like > >> its been through Google translate. > > > > Because it's not a maximum? > > Yeah, min_wal_segments or something would make sense. It sounds about as > good or bad as wal_keep_segments to me.
I admit I never liked "keep" but couldn't think of better wording. I do like the proposed wording better. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
