On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 18:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I think you missed the point: "do nothing" is not a viable option. > I was proposing something that seemed simple enough to be safe to > drop into 9.0 at this point.
I've posted a patch that meets your stated objections. If you could review that, this could be done in an hour. There are other ways, but you'll need to explain a proposal in enough detail that we're clear what you actually mean. > I'm less convinced that what Simon is proposing is safe enough. Which proposal? -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
