On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 17:49 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: > On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 12:04 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Normal shutdown didn't work on a standby before HS was committed and it > didn't work afterwards either. Use all the capitals you like but if you > use poor arguments and combine that with no evidence then we'll not get > very far, either in working together or in solving the actual bugs. > Please don't continue to make wild speculations about things related to > HS and recovery, so that issues do not become confused; there is no need > to comment on every thread. > Simon, People are very passionate about this feature. This feature has the ability to show us as moving forward in a fashion that will allow us to directly compete with the "big boys" in the "big installs", although we are still probably 2-3 releases from that. It also has the ability to make us look like a bunch of yahoos (no pun intended) who are better served beating up on that database that Oracle just bought, versus Oracle itself. Patience is a virtue for all when it comes to the this feature. Joshua D. Drake -- PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564 Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
