On tor, 2010-05-13 at 04:41 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > Right, and omitting tags was in fact one of the "features" of fromcvs > > that made us use it, because any tool that tries to convert tags will > > explode on our CVS tree, for reasons explained in the above paragraph. > > > > We have also discussed this in more detail about three times before. > > Well, yes, but I have been wondering if this has to be an all or nothing > deal. How many tags can we not tie to a known tree in git? My suspicion > is we can probably identify most of them quite well. If we can that > would be nice.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-04/msg00036.php -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
