On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> I'm with Stephen on this one. I agree that standardizing the function >>> names and behavior would be a good idea, but don't try to put them all >>> in one place. > >> Some of the existing functions are in lsyscache.c, some are in files >> in the commands directory, and some are in files in the parser >> directory; also, even between commands and parser, not every object >> type has its own file. It would be nice to bring some consistency to >> where the functions are located as well as what they do. Any thoughts >> on how to achieve that? > > I think both Stephen and I are saying we don't see merit in that. > Moving around pre-existing functions won't accomplish much except > causing include-list churn. Let's just standardize the names/APIs > and be done.
Where do we put the new functions? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers