Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I think both Stephen and I are saying we don't see merit in that.
>> Moving around pre-existing functions won't accomplish much except
>> causing include-list churn. Let's just standardize the names/APIs
>> and be done.
> Where do we put the new functions?
Probably in files that are already concerned with each object type.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
