On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > It'd be nice to have as a side effect, but if not, IMHO this proposal > could simply use a fixed buffer pool like all other slru.c callers until > someone gets around to fixing that. Adding more GUC switches for this > strikes me as overkill.
I agree. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
